Your team makes it successfully through the release cycle, but you can’t shake the overall feeling of chaos that only seems to increase as additional team members come on board and the number of projects in your pipeline keeps growing.
You frequently spend more time than you’d like on manually recreating inbound changesets for outbound deployment and waiting for changesets to upload to your target orgs. In the absence of Salesforce source control, team members can unwittingly deploy conflicting changes or overwrite one another’s changes in cases of irreversible “code clobbering.”. If your team does track this information about changes, it involves a good deal of manual, data-entry work that takes time away from valuable development tasks. Your team does much of its development and testing in just one or two sandboxes, making it hard to track which team member and what stage of the release process a given change belongs to. Do any of these situations sound familiar? A day in the life of a dev team that relies on changesets If you are an admin or developer in a growing team, take a moment to look back at your recent project experiences. Though Salesforce changesets offer an adequate, built-in way to deploy metadata changes from org to org, their limited functionality can prove challenging as development projects and teams scale up. 3 Steps to Migrate from Salesforce Changesets for Better Application Lifecycle Management
0 kommentar(er)
